FOCL Practice Test 2026 – All-in-One Resource to Master Your Exam Success!

Question: 1 / 400

What legal justification could Dr. Mark provide for the tooth extraction on Natalie?

That it was urgent medical care

The consent given was valid

The legal justification Dr. Mark could provide for the tooth extraction on Natalie is that the consent given was valid. In medical practice, obtaining informed consent is a fundamental requirement before performing any procedure, including tooth extractions. Valid consent means that the patient was fully informed about the nature of the procedure, its risks and benefits, and they voluntarily agreed to proceed.

Without valid consent, a medical professional could face legal liabilities such as battery or malpractice. Therefore, proving that Natalie understood and agreed to the extraction is a key factor in justifying Dr. Mark's actions legally. This defense underscores the importance of patient autonomy and the ethical obligation of healthcare providers to ensure that patients are appropriately informed about the medical interventions they are undergoing.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

His qualifications as a dentist

It was a routine procedure

Next Question

Report this question

Download FOCL Practice Test PDF Study Guide
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy